WYPR Board Plans More Revenue, Ignores Steiner (Updated at 4 P.M.)

May 22, 2008

The WYPR board of directors met yesterday on May 21 at The Family Tree in front of a select audience of eight members from the public and spoke mostly about how to boost WYPR revenue. They did not discuss anything related to their Feb. 1 firing of Marc Steiner, or WYPR programming. They did not broadly discuss the April 15 recommendations of the WYPR Community Advisory Board (CAB).

WYPR’s board member in charge of governance issues noted that he has spoken with CAB chairperson Doreen Bolger, and that he intends to seek outside consulting on WYPR’s governance structure. This is in accordance with a CAB recommendation of seeking an outside “audit,” though WYPR’s board is pursuing a more informal exploration than that. WYPR’s board decided against spending money on this as of now.

Outside The Family Tree gathered about 20 protesters looking to reinstate the Marc Steiner Show and reform WYPR practices in general. One board member did stop outside to chat, as seen in the picture below.

According to the saveWYPR.com reporter at the scene, WYPR kept the meeting room artificially full so that only 8 members of the public could be allowed in. Two empty seats remained, nevertheless. The room could have accommodated 5 to 10 more folding chairs.

WYPR’s fiscal year runs from May 15 to May 15 (2007-2008). Their total revenues were $4.9 million according to the WYPR board, and total expenses $4.412 million. They ended the year with a surplus of $479,000.

Membership comprises “almost” 33 percent of revenue, noted WYPR President Tony Brandon in a prepared speech. Underwriting goals were exceeded by around $80,000.

According to the board meeting, two growing revenue streams for WYPR are their new Ocean City, Maryland station and podcasting content from other organizations on the WYPR Web site.

This meeting also was the last with WYPR Board Chair Barbara Bozzuto as the chairperson. She received commendations from Mayor Sheila Dixon and Governor O’Malley. I am not going anywhere, she vowed lightheartedly, though seriously.

WYPR’s board spent the entire time discussing financial issues, revenue, and increasing revenue. This makes some sense considering the May 21 board meeting comes at the close of their fiscal year on May 15. However a lack of interest in programming–more even than ignoring the community’s outrage–shows a narrowness of vision.

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. helen  |  May 22, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    It looks like from the WYPR website that this live streaming audio of the BOD meeting didn’t work. Did they not even test it out? Clearly allowing only 8 people in is not reasonable accomodation for this meeting, considering that dozens of people showed up at the previous meeting. the web stream that they were using to try and skirt the issue didn’t even work!!!!! what plans are being made to organize complaints to the CPB?

    Reply
  • 2. helen  |  May 22, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    ALSO, why has the CAB’s report not been posted to the CAB blog? Because the CAB blog is run by Alex Price of WYPR. SHAMEFUL.

    Reply
  • 3. savewypr  |  May 22, 2008 at 8:15 pm

    WYPR Community Advisory Board (CAB) recommendations can be found here on this Web site. They are transcribed from a handout given out by the CAB chairperson to audience members during the April 15, 2008 WYPR board meeting.

    The only missing data is footnotes included in the handout, but not here. See the bottom of this WYPR article link for the CAB recommendations:
    http://savewypr.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/wypr-community-advisory-board-recommendations/

    Reply
  • 4. count  |  May 22, 2008 at 10:20 pm

    The footnotes to CAB recommendations are included here:

    http://marcsteinerblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/417-from-marc-on-wypr-bod-meeting/#comment-1358

    Reply
  • 5. Sarah  |  May 22, 2008 at 11:22 pm

    Please do not attack employees of WYPR for CAB related issues…as an employee Alex Price does what management tells her to do…the CAB is perfectly capable of asserting their right to management of their own website, but they have not done so.

    Reply
  • 6. Joe in Waverly  |  May 23, 2008 at 6:00 am

    I filed a complaint today as an individual with the CPB Ombudsman by email and by phone message with the Office of the Inspector General regarding the closing and the ridiculously absurd opening
    gambit for the Select 8 of the BoD meeting. The non-functioning of their internet feed was the piece de resistance and puts these incompetent clods in serious violation of the Communications Act.

    I suggest everyone of us do the same ASAP.

    Reply
  • 7. Noway  |  June 20, 2008 at 6:55 pm

    Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway … nice blog to visit.

    cheers, Noway!

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

Blogroll

Top Clicks